Architects and large egos are often synonymous.
Name any starchitect. They are all extremely passionate. Supremely confident. And exceedingly narcissistic.
Traditionally, every generation of architecture student is bred into this role of “master” and “intern.” While architecture, in practice, is a collaborative effort – our education emphasizes this individual pursuit of one figure-head. One infallible starchitect whose vision and aesthetics are the quintessential answer.
However, architecture is unlike many other professions. An architect rarely gets noticed before she is 50 years old. While tech-entrepreneurs are running enterprises in their late twenties, architects often toil away for decades before being allowed to make an impact.
It takes years of experience and relationships to begin to reach the pinnacle of one’s profession. Only through supreme confidence, sheer narcissism, and a little optimism, can an architect survive before reaching their true potential.
Therefore, narcissism is an essential evolutionary skill that allows young architects to not become depressed and leave the profession. While narcissism is advantageous for one’s career, a cock-sure millennial appears destructive within society. Furthermore, being presumptuously infallible and and always thinking your correct can lead to failed relationships.
This is why I found the following chart of “Who Marries Whom” to be enlightening.
Male architects are most likely to marry elementary and middle school teachers. Indeed, in my firm alone half of the male architects are in fact married to elementary school teachers. I don’t think this is a coincidence, but rather a predictable outcome. While most women wouldn’t put up with a narcissistic asshole, teachers seem more likely to coddle and constantly reinforce their partner’s self-idolized image. “Great job Brady. You get a sticker.”
Therefore, what would happen if you gave a young 40 year-old architect constant praise and worldwide commissions seemingly before he “put in his time”? The profession filled with large egos would breed an ever larger ego. And thus Bjarke Ingels was born.
Speaking of large egos, Donald Trump1 better watch out. Remarkably, Trump is marching his way closer to becoming the next President of the United States, but Bjarke Ingels is slowly encroaching upon Trump’s status as King of New York.2 Bjarke is currently completing his “courtscraper” project on West 57th, has proposed a new “Dryline” (ala the High Line), and is also designing the highly lauded 2 World Trade Center. Indeed, the New York skyline is changing, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Bjarke also starts adding his name in giant gold letters to his buildings.
I must admit. I used to be completely smitten with Bjarke Ingels Group. I followed his transition from PLOT to BIG. But then consecutive projects with flashy neon graphics and simplified diagrams appeared to become too contrived.
Furthermore, I started an ongoing blog post called Architect Arithmetic. Where 1 image + 1 image = Final Building. But after trying to do a Bjarke Ingels Architect Arithmetic, I realized I couldn’t be clever because Bjarke already just combines 2 simplified ideas into 1 form.
Ski Hill + Smokestack = Copenhagen Power Plant (with a ski hill)
Courtyard + skyscraper = West 57th Courtscraper
I recently attended a lecture by Frank Bardow of the German architectural firm Barkow Leibinger. It was one of those lectures that was refreshing and invigorating. Witnessing beautiful architectural projects created through rigorous design processes makes Bjarke Ingels approach appear rudimentary.
Interestingly, Barkow Leibinger is designing one of the Summer Houses at the Serpentine Gallery, but the main pavilion is designed by… Bjarke Ingels Group.
In my opinion, Barkow Leibinger isn’t playing second fiddle to Bjarke because they are inferior architects, rather Bjarke Ingels is just a more recognized name. Barkow Leibinger is theorizing innovative solutions for German refugees, but Bjarke Ingels is commissioned to build skyscrapers in New York. Bjarke Ingels may not be a superior architect to Barkow Leibinger, but through his charisma and giant ego he convinces individuals that his ideas are in fact BIG. Like German refugee crisis BIG.
While Frank Barkow is extremely intelligent, he still appears fairly modest. I think this is why you know the name Bjarke Ingels and not Frank Barkow or Regine Leibinger. Developers in New York want to hire an architect with a rock-star status. Having a large ego fuels the rock-star status. And having a rock-star status creates a larger ego. It becomes a never-ending feedback loop.
Oftentimes I can be snarky and demeaning toward other people’s work in an effort to prop up my own ego. While Bjarke Ingels Group’s work is oftentimes basic and contrived. Bjarke’s ego allows for his worldwide commissions to become reality. Neon graphics, spiky hair, and prattling on about Nietzsche in a Danish accent allows for his architecture to appear fresh and new.
Maybe after all this prattling, I’m still trying to make excuses for being selfish. Even after recognizing that I’m a narcissist – am I still too self-centered to change? Or perhaps I’m just upset I didn’t marry an elementary school teacher. Nope. That would imply self-doubt. A narcissistic catch-22. Oh well, I hope it doesn’t go to my head.3
Click the purple numerals to transport between hyperlinks
1 And if you think Donald Trump is compensating for his small hand size. What is Bjarke compensating for by having the web address big.dk (Yeah, I think I took this joke too far)
2 Next stop White House! And if you think Bjarke can’t become President of the U.S.A. because he was born in Denmark – then explain Ted Cruz? There is even rumors swirling that if there is a contested Republican convention, Bjarke Ingels might become the next nominee.
3 But I think it’s too late.
- This post is part of the #ArchiTalks series in which the multi-faceted architect Bob Borson, of Life of an Architect, selects a theme and a group of us other (architectural) bloggers all post on the same day, on the same topic. This month’s theme is Architecture and ….
Bob Borson – Life of an Architect (@bobborson)
Life of an Architect
Marica McKeel – Studio MM (@ArchitectMM)
Architecture and Photography
Jeff Echols – Architect Of The Internet (@Jeff_Echols)
Architecture and a Future Without Architects
Lee Calisti, AIA – Think Architect (@LeeCalisti)
architecture and __
Lora Teagarden – L² Design, LLC (@L2DesignLLC)
Architecture and Travel
Collier Ward – One More Story (@BuildingContent)
Architecture and Storytelling
Jes Stafford – MODwelling (@modarchitect)
Architecture and Gaming
Eric T. Faulkner – Rock Talk (@wishingrockhome)
architecture and m&ms
Rosa Sheng – EquitybyDesign [EQxD] (@EquityxDesign)
Architecture And the Era of Connection
Michele Grace Hottel – Michele Grace Hottel, Architect (@mghottel)
#ArchiTalks 18: architecture and… the bigger picture
Meghana Joshi – IRA Consultants, LLC (@MeghanaIRA)
Architalks 18: Architecture and Mathematics
Amy Kalar – ArchiMom (@AmyKalar)
Architalks 18: Architecture and … Parenting
Michael Riscica – Young Architect (@YoungArchitxPDX)
Architecture and Yoga
Michael LaValley – Evolving Architect (@archivalley)
Architecture and Ego / The Architect’s Unique Struggle with ‘Good’ Design
Sharon George – Architecture By George (@sharonraigeorge)
Architecture and Kids
Emily Grandstaff-Rice – Emily Grandstaff-Rice FAIA (@egrfaia)
Architecture and More
Jarod Hall – di’velept (@divelept)
Architecture and the Myth of the Master Builder
Greg Croft – Sage Leaf Group (@croft_gregory)
Architecture and Real Estate
Jeffrey A Pelletier – Board & Vellum (@boardandvellum)
Architecture and Interior Design
Samantha Raburn – The Aspiring Architect (@TheAspiringArch)
Architecture and Wrestling
Keith Palma – Architect’s Trace (@cogitatedesign)
Architecture + Memories
Adam Denais – Defragging Architecture (@DefragArch)
[#ArchiTalks 18] Architecture and Strange Travel Etiquette
Jim Mehaffey – Yeoman Architect (@jamesmehaffey)
Architecture and…my Generation.